PRASHANT GUPTA vs STATE OF NCT

BAIL APPLN. 911/2019 & CRL.M.(BAIL) 657/2019& CRL.M.A. 34196/2019 & 40070/2019

CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT [ DELHI HIGH COURT ]

 

• Sections 498A, 406 and 34 IPC Anticipatory bail Mentally and physically harassment Husband stated that since wife is not capable of sexual intercourse, he cannot continue this relation Husband is personally present in court and has admitted that during stay of 24 days, they had sexual relations If the petitioner is admitting that they had sexual intercourse during aforesaid period, then this court cannot believe that the Husband and wife did not have sexual relations at least after marriage Thus, he has bluffed and misled this court by making a wrong allegations against wife Court has granted anticipatory and regular bail but keeping in view the conduct of the husband Not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner Moreover, dowry articles are yet to be recovered from petitioner Petition dismissed.

 

for read the judgment click here :

Prashant gupta vs STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR delhi high court

all rights reserved (Vaibhav Tomar 𝔸𝕕𝕧)