13Feb, 2023
Best Law firm in Delhi
SANDEEP vs STATE OF HARYANA CRLWP 8954/12 16/09/21
•Hindu Marriage Act Section 9 Writ of habeas corpus Custody of minor child Petitioner is the natural guardian of his minor child But for some bald allegations made against him, there is no reason to be believe that he would not conduct himself as a good and caring father – Divorce and custody battles can become a quagmire and it is heart wrenching to see that the innocent child is the ultimate sufferer who gets caught up in the legal and psychological battle between the parents. The eventful agreement about custody may often be a reflection of the parents’ interests, rather than the child’s. The issue in a child custody dispute is what will become of the child, but ordinarily the child is not a true participant in the process. While the best-interests principle requires that the primary focus be on the interests of the child, the child ordinarily does not define those interests himself nor does he have representation in the ordinary sense Custody of minor child to father.
click here for the judgment
Sandeep Kumar @ Sandeep Chugh Versus State of Haryana and Others FINAL_ORDER
According to the Bar Council of India rules, advocates are not permitted to advertise or solicit work in any manner. Adv. Vaibhav Tomar and Associates Law Office confirms that the content of this website is for general information only. The user by accessing this website confirms that Law Literates(Law Firm) and/or its members have not advertised, induced or solicited work from the user through this website and that the user seeks to gain information about this law office in his/her own accord.