22Dec, 2022
Best Law firm in Delhi
[ MADRAS HIGH COURT ]
Mr.S.Karunakaran vs Ms.Srileka AS 292/19 [ SATHISH KUMAR JJ ]
Hindu Marriage Act, Section 8 Information Technology Act Section 2 Marriage Validity Mere registration under section 8 of the Hindu Marriage Act will not give any sanctity in the eye of law Relationship of the plaintiff and the defendant during the college days and the fact that the plaintiff is in adolescent age who hass just attained majority and the defendant is in a dominant position to dominate her will and the solemnization of marriage not being proved Email correspondences between the plaintiff and the defendant By mere filing of email, it cannot be said that those emails have been proved as per law.
adv Vaibhav Tomar
file:///C:/Users/hp/Downloads/Mr_S_Karunakaran_vs_Ms_Srileka_on_21_March_2019%20(1).PDF
According to the Bar Council of India rules, advocates are not permitted to advertise or solicit work in any manner. Adv. Vaibhav Tomar and Associates Law Office confirms that the content of this website is for general information only. The user by accessing this website confirms that Law Literates(Law Firm) and/or its members have not advertised, induced or solicited work from the user through this website and that the user seeks to gain information about this law office in his/her own accord.