9Mar, 2024
Best Law firm in Delhi
[ MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT ](1) FA No. 217 of 2015
Smt. Pushpa Devi vs. Santoshi Lal Sharma
Order 9, Rule 13 CPC Divorce petition Setting aside of ex parte decree Appellant had engaged as her lawyer for prosecuting her case in the divorce petition filed by her husband/respondent, who had assured her not to come to the Court on each date of hearing and he will call her as and when required – In the present matter, the appellant is 57 years old lady and could not be made to suffer on the fault of her counsel – She has given sufficient cause/reason for nonappearance of her/her counsel before the Court concerned whereby an ex parte judgment and decree has been passed against her – Appeal Allowed.
To read the judgment click here
FA_217_2015_FinalOrder_16-Sep-2021 Smt. Pushpa Devi vs. Santoshi Lal Sharma
All Rights Reserved (Vaibhav Tomar Adv)
According to the Bar Council of India rules, advocates are not permitted to advertise or solicit work in any manner. Adv. Vaibhav Tomar and Associates Law Office confirms that the content of this website is for general information only. The user by accessing this website confirms that Law Literates(Law Firm) and/or its members have not advertised, induced or solicited work from the user through this website and that the user seeks to gain information about this law office in his/her own accord.