15Jun, 2024
Best Law firm in Delhi
Sharanjit vs State of Punjab CRR 3672/18 07/10/23 [HON’BLE JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH ]
[ PUNJAB HARYANA HIGH COURT ]
Sections 420, 306, 34 and 120B IPC Framing of charges Abetment to Suicide Money Dispute Non Payment of Debt – No evidence on the file that the deceased had either initiated proceedings against the accused for cheating/theft of the cheques during his life-time or had given intimation of the theft of the cheques to his Bank – Merely because the petitioner had availed his legal remedy under section 138 of the NI Act in which the deceased came to be convicted could not amount to abetment or harassment – Charges framed qua the petitioner set aside. [Paras 13, 19 and 20]
To read the judgment click here
Sharanjit Singh V:s State of Punjab judgment P&H High court The Law Literates
All Rights Reserved (Adv Vaibhav Tomar)
According to the Bar Council of India rules, advocates are not permitted to advertise or solicit work in any manner. Adv. Vaibhav Tomar and Associates Law Office confirms that the content of this website is for general information only. The user by accessing this website confirms that Law Literates(Law Firm) and/or its members have not advertised, induced or solicited work from the user through this website and that the user seeks to gain information about this law office in his/her own accord.