26Apr, 2024
Best Law firm in Delhi
COMMISSIONER OF POLICE vs SANT RAM
WPC 5562/24 23/04/24 [CORAM:
HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE ]
[ DELHI HIGH COURT ]
Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace Act Section 11 – Inquiry into complaint – The respondent, a constable in Delhi Police, was dismissed from service without a departmental enquiry, following allegations of sexual harassment – The main issue is whether the dismissal without an enquiry was justified under Article 311(2)(b) of the Constitution of India – The petitioner argued that the enquiry was not held due to the serious nature of the charges and the threat to the complainant and witnesses – The respondent contended that there was no evidence of threats and that the dismissal was unjustified without a proper enquiry – The court found that the dismissal was not in accordance with the principles of natural justice and the provisions of the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace Act, 2013 –
The court concluded that the dismissal order was not reasonably practicable and was violative of Article 311(2)(b), thus dismissing the writ petition – The court allowed the original application, setting aside the dismissal order and granting liberty to initiate disciplinary proceedings as per law.
To read the judgment click here
COMMISSIONER OF POLICE AND ORS VERSUS DANT RAM THE LAW LITERATES
All Rights Reserved (Vaibhav Tomar Adv)
According to the Bar Council of India rules, advocates are not permitted to advertise or solicit work in any manner. Adv. Vaibhav Tomar and Associates Law Office confirms that the content of this website is for general information only. The user by accessing this website confirms that Law Literates(Law Firm) and/or its members have not advertised, induced or solicited work from the user through this website and that the user seeks to gain information about this law office in his/her own accord.